Moon Landing Video

The presence of footage from space, particularly from the moon, is one of the most common arguments made against FET. Though there is a conspiracy, the moon landing is often defended.

The Argument
There is video from the moon and, more than that, the video of astronauts moving around in the lower gravity is beyond the ability of those at the time to fake. Before computer graphics were possible, everything from the light to the movement had to be genuine. Any experts asked say that there is no way to fake the videos with the technology of the time.

The Response
It must first be acknowledged that the appeal to authority used is not meaningful. Experts asked how they would create fake footage with technology from the 1960s are people that do not have to work with that technology, and so are less familiar or as adept with its use as those of the time. Further, they would have minutes or at best hours to work on the problem, while those behind the moon landing had a team and a period of seven years. The claim that they could not have worked on a solution from either the technological or filmmaking standpoint is unjustified.

Beyond that, there are a number of suggested ways to simulate what the footage presents. For example, slow motion is often presented as an option for how the odd movement of the astronauts is presented. With practise to create sufficiently odd looking motion, and other potential aspects mentioned above, these supposedly impossible feats could be replicated.